<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Waves.ky &#187; Java</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waves.ky/category/programming/java/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waves.ky</link>
	<description>Caymanian Geek...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 16:22:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Questions about JXTA</title>
		<link>http://waves.ky/2003/07/24/questions-about-jxta/</link>
		<comments>http://waves.ky/2003/07/24/questions-about-jxta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2003 22:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gareth Farrington]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waves.dreamhosters.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JXTA is a standard (and accompanying reference implementation in Java) for P2P nodes to connect, form groups and &#8216;advertise services&#8217;. I&#8217;m currently looking at JXTA for the core networking technology in my project. Several things have struck me about JXTA&#8217;s design as overly presumptuous and are deal breakers for me. All peers belong to the [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://jxta.org">JXTA</a> is a standard (and accompanying reference implementation in Java) for P2P nodes to connect, form groups and &#8216;advertise services&#8217;. I&#8217;m currently looking at JXTA for the core networking technology in my project.  Several things have struck me about JXTA&#8217;s design as overly presumptuous and are deal breakers for me.</p>
<p>All peers belong to the &#8220;World Peer Group&#8221;. I presume this means that all peers can communicate with each other because they belong to this group. Furthermore all peers are encouraged to rout traffic for each other. As a peer I would not be inclined to rout traffic unless it directly benefited me or other peers in my group. The last thing I want to be doing is routing traffic for some file sharing service when I&#8217;m trying to commit to changes to the group. My traffic comes first, preferable exclusively. The only thing I would agree to route for other peers would be discovery messages. Using the network at large to help people find each other is a fair exchange in value for traffic.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m aiming for a secure network. It seams peers can join my group without authenticating with one of the group members first. I want to have a custom authentication protocol with public key encryption.</p>
<p>There dost seam to be clear answers to these questions on the JXTA website either. I guess its time to dig into the protocol spec to find out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://waves.ky/2003/07/24/questions-about-jxta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
